The team categorized patients into groups based on treatment: group 1 (topical therapy), group 2 (phototherapy), group 3 (conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as methotrexate), group 4 (biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs which were stratified according to biologic class). In the cohort, 360 were treated with TNFi, 186 with anti-IL-12/23, 71 with anti-IL-17, 969 with methotrexate, 4357 with phototherapy, and 53,917 with topical therapy.
Investigators observed the PsA incidence rate was lower in the biologic agent group compared to the methotrexate group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 – 0.62). Biologic treatment groups had variation in PsA incidence rates per 100 person-years, with anti-IL-12/13 or anti-IL-23p19 group at 4.57, the anti-IL-17 group at 4.35, and the TNF inhibitor group at 2.55). Despite the variation, the team observed no differences between several biological agents in their PsA prevention.
They also saw the phototherapy group demonstrated a greater incidence rate of PsA than the topical therapy group (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.65 – 2.07).
However, investigators saw the risk of developing PsA was greater for individuals treated with biologics, compared to the topical treatment group (adjusted HR [aHR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.44 – 3.24). The increased PsA risk was exhibited when examining the anti-IL-17 (aHR, 6.70; 95% CI, 2.03 – 22.05) and anti-IL-12/23 or anti-IL-23p19 groups individually (aHR, 95% CI, 2.94 – 14.53).
“This discovery invites further consideration and aligns well with the prevailing notion that PsA risk is intricately tied to high PASI scores,” investigators wrote. “It is plausible that individuals relying solely on topical therapy may have presented with lower PASI scores, thus contributing to the reduced risk of PsA.”
In contrast, the TNFi group did not show a statistically significant difference in PsA group when compared with the topical therapy group (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.79 – 2.33) nor with phototherapy (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.88 – 2.08).
Limitations Highlighted by Investigators:
- Potentially not accounting for confounding factors
- Not considering other outcomes like joint damage, functional impairment, and quality of life
- A minority of patients on systematic therapy versus non-systematic therapy
- Dermatologists frequently use systemic treatment which may introduce bias
Ultimately, the analysis revealed no significant differences in PsA risk between the TNFi, anti‑IL‑12/23 or anti‑IL‑23p19, and anti-IL-17 treatment groups. Conversely, patients in the methotrexate group showed a significantly greater risk of developing PsA when compared to both topical (aHR, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.68 – 3.96) or phototherapy groups (aHR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.74 – 2.77).
Furthermore, a multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed patients exposed to ≥ 2 biological agents were linked to a significantly greater PsA risk (odds ratio [OR], 6.09; 95% CI, 3.49 – 10.64; P < .001), as well as previous methotrexate therapy (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.07 – 3.27; P = .026).
“These findings collectively support the notion that severe psoriasis is a significant risk factor for PsA,” investigators wrote.
References
- Watad A, Zabotti A, Patt YS, et al. From Psoriasis to Psoriatic Arthritis: Decoding the Impact of Treatment Modalities on the Prevention of Psoriatic Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. Published online June 7, 2024. doi:10.1007/s40744-024-00680-3
- Kimak A, Robak E, Makowska J, Woźniacka A. Psoriatic Arthritis: Development, Detection and Prevention: A Scoping Review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(11):3850. Published 2023 Jun 5. doi:10.3390/jcm12113850