
CD19 CAR T Shows Early Remission in Treatment-Refractory RA
In phase 1 COMPARE, 4 of 6 patients with refractory RA achieved remission by week 36 following CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.
Four of 6 patients with highly treatment-refractory
Fredrik Albach, MD, of the Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology at Charité University Medicine Berlin, and colleagues are presenting the findings at the
COMPARE Evaluates CD19 CAR T in Refractory RA
The phase 1 portion of the prospective, open-label phase 1/2 COMPARE trial enrolled 6 patients with active, anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive RA. Participants had a median disease duration of 9.6 years and a median baseline Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) of 5.5.¹
Patients had received a median of 6.5 prior biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs), including rituximab in 4 patients. Each participant received fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion followed by a single infusion of autologous CD19-directed CAR T cells, mivocabtagene autoleucel.¹
The primary endpoint was safety, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and adverse events. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included clinical activity, CAR T-cell expansion, B-cell depletion and reconstitution, autoantibody dynamics, and longitudinal immune profiling. Median follow-up was 36 weeks (range, 36-52).¹
Four Patients Achieve Remission by Week 36
All 6 participants demonstrated clinical improvement after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapies. By week 36, 4 had achieved DAS28-CRP remission and an American College of Rheumatology 70% improvement response (ACR70).¹,²
The trial met its primary safety endpoint. CRS occurred at grade 1 in 4 patients and grade 2 in 2 patients. No ICANS was reported, although 1 participant experienced a transient dose-limiting elevation in liver enzymes.¹,²
Investigators observed CAR T-cell expansion and profound B-cell depletion in blood and tissue compartments. This was accompanied by a 94% reduction in antibodies against mutated citrullinated vimentin (MCV-ACPA), with seroconversion reported in 5 patients, and an 89% reduction in rheumatoid factor immunoglobulin M (RF IgM), with seroconversion reported in 4 patients.¹
Repopulating B cells predominantly exhibited a naïve or transitional phenotype without cyclic citrullinated peptide reactivity.¹
Responses were not uniform. Two patients experienced disease flares during follow-up, including 1 following glucocorticoid withdrawal in the setting of ongoing disease activity and another after 10 months of prior remission.¹
“These early Phase 1 results demonstrate that CD19 CAR T-cell therapy was feasible and met the study’s primary safety endpoint in this small cohort, while showing clinically meaningful activity,” Albach said in an ACR statement.²
The findings remain preliminary given the 6-patient sample, lack of a comparator group, and limited follow-up. The results do not establish comparative efficacy, long-term remission durability, or the safety profile of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in a broader RA population.
Separate Lupus Study Examines Patient Priorities for CAR T
A separate ACR 2026 study examined how patients with severe
Conducted through a collaboration between the Lupus Foundation of America and Fate Therapeutics, the qualitative study involved 5 adults with active, severe SLE. All participants identified as Black/African American women, including 1 who also identified as Hispanic. The study evaluated patient preferences regarding FT819, an investigational, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived, off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy.³
Participants reported taking 2-4 SLE-specific medications and 6-17 additional medications, with some receiving care from as many as 12 physicians. Safety ranked as the highest treatment priority for 4 of 5 participants, while speed of clinical effect consistently ranked lowest.²,³
Duration of benefit also influenced treatment preferences. Participants generally considered 1 year insufficient, identified 2 years as the minimum acceptable duration, and preferred benefit lasting at least 5 years. All 5 expressed a preference for the allogeneic approach over autologous CAR T-cell therapy, citing anticipated advantages in availability, hospitalization, conditioning intensity, and product consistency.²,³
However, interest remained conditional on safety, specialist care, financial support, and other treatment-related considerations. These preferences were reported by a small, selected focus group and cannot establish the clinical superiority or broader acceptability of allogeneic CAR T-cell therapy in SLE.
The COMPARE results and lupus patient-perspectives findings address different questions in CAR T-cell development. Together, they highlight the need for larger controlled clinical studies and further research into patient priorities as these investigational therapies advance.
References
Albach F, Rehm M, Hütter-Krönke ML, et al. CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in highly treatment-refractory rheumatoid arthritis: phase 1 results from the COMPARE trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2026;78(suppl 9). Abstract 1902.
ACR abstract . Accessed November 8, 2026.American College of Rheumatology. New ACR Convergence 2026 data highlight both clinical promise and patient priorities for CAR T-cell therapy in severe autoimmune disease. Published November 7, 2026. Accessed November 8, 2026.
ACR press release .Buie J, Agyemang S, Henry A, et al. Patient perspectives on allogeneic CAR T cell therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: findings from a focus group study (part 3). Arthritis Rheumatol. 2026;78(suppl 9). Abstract 1539.
ACR abstract . Accessed November 8, 2026.
Related to this article








