Opinion|Videos|September 5, 2024
Guiding Treatment Decisions: The Role of Remission Data and Head-to-Head Comparisons
Panelists discuss how head-to-head clinical trial data shape their treatment decisions, the significance of consistent remission rates across different patient populations, and the frequency with which remission data influence their choices to switch therapies.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
Video content above is prompted by the following:
- How do head-to-head data affect your treatment decisions?
- What does consistency of remission across patient types mean to you?
How often do you rely on remission data when considering switching therapies?
Advertisement
Related to this article
The EC approved upadacitinib for active polyarticular JIA in children 2 years and older, based on phase 1 SELECT-YOUTH efficacy and safety data.
Amgen reported dazodalibep met its primary endpoint in the phase 3 OASIZ-301 trial, improving ESSDAI score in moderate-to-severe systemic Sjögren's disease.
Rozanolixizumab improved FIQR score at 10 weeks but did not reach 2-sided statistical significance on its primary BPI-SF interference endpoint.
Two-year data from the open-label extension show sustained ACR and MDA response rates for the TYK2 inhibitor in active psoriatic arthritis.
Oberlin outlines what dermatologists should weigh, beyond APEX's radiographic data, when selecting a biologic for PsA.
Beeline Medicines reported positive topline data meeting primary SRI-4 endpoint at week 48 across all 3 doses in systemic lupus erythematosus.
The designation follows phase 2 IMPACT trial data showing reduced adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk antiphospholipid syndrome.
In a large real-world PsA cohort, higher BMI reduced the odds of minimal disease activity, especially with TNF inhibitors other than infliximab.
Advertisement
Advertisement