
Opinion|Videos|September 12, 2024
JAK Inhibitors vs TNF Inhibitors: Effects on Administration, Efficacy, and Safety
Panelists discuss how JAK inhibitors and TNF inhibitors differ in administration, efficacy, and safety due to their unique characteristics and mechanisms of action, with further variations in binding activities within the TNFi class impacting clinical outcomes.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) present with differing characteristics and mechanisms of action (MOA), both between the 2 classes and within each class.
- Multiple characteristics distinguish JAKis from TNFis. For example, JAKis are stable small molecule proteins with a short half-life whereas TNFis are heat-sensitive monoclonal antibodies with a long half-life. How do their differences affect administration, efficacy, and safety outcomes?
- The MOA within the TNFi class also varies. Etanercept binds both TNF-a and TNF-b with high affinity whereas infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab-pegol bind to TNF-a with high affinity but not TNF-b. What implications are associated with these different binding activities
Advertisement
Related to this article

The EC approved upadacitinib for active polyarticular JIA in children 2 years and older, based on phase 1 SELECT-YOUTH efficacy and safety data.

Amgen reported dazodalibep met its primary endpoint in the phase 3 OASIZ-301 trial, improving ESSDAI score in moderate-to-severe systemic Sjögren's disease.

Rozanolixizumab improved FIQR score at 10 weeks but did not reach 2-sided statistical significance on its primary BPI-SF interference endpoint.

Two-year data from the open-label extension show sustained ACR and MDA response rates for the TYK2 inhibitor in active psoriatic arthritis.

Oberlin outlines what dermatologists should weigh, beyond APEX's radiographic data, when selecting a biologic for PsA.

Beeline Medicines reported positive topline data meeting primary SRI-4 endpoint at week 48 across all 3 doses in systemic lupus erythematosus.

The designation follows phase 2 IMPACT trial data showing reduced adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk antiphospholipid syndrome.
Advertisement
Advertisement

